Tobold muses about whether the success of two recent strategy games in which the player can actually lose the campaign against the computer pave the way for tougher failure penalties in MMO's. Ironically, today's seemingly lenient penalties are arguably MORE punitive than the seemingly harsher penalties in the days of old.
Based on my experience with X-Com in the late 90's, seeing how different strategic choices influence the outcome is the fun part of the strategy game. In some ways, "losing" the game meant a fresh start where you could try a different approach to combating the alien invasion. The penalty for failure was only a penalty if you did not like the game that you were playing.
Meanwhile, as I've written for a long time now, all death penalties in MMO's can effectively be expressed in terms of the time it will take to get your character back to the state they were in prior to their unfortunate mishap. Whether it's the time to run back from the graveyard, payoff exp debt, replace lost gears and levels, or even to re-roll after hardcore perma-death, there is always some quantity of time that will repair your losses.
The difference between Tobold's bygone era, where this threat brought communities together, and today is a more diverse playerbase. In an era where the predominant form of play was grinding mobs in a group of your friends, the loss of exp just meant more time grinding mobs in a group of your friends - i.e. only a penalty if you did not like the game you were playing.
Today's genre attempts to draw a wide range of playstyles, such as solo players, small groups (who may not have tanking/healing), structured groups, raiders, crafters, etc. More to the point, developers are increasingly using incentives to get players to use the other forms of content, as they cannot afford to let the development time used to support all of this stuff sit idle. The result is that, if you were to lose gear or exp as a result of death, you would probably be forced to go do something you do NOT enjoy to get it back. Having to spend an hour to re-queue and repeat a dungeon finder PUG that failed is arguably WORSE than losing a level in EQ1, because you did not want to be doing PUG dungeon finder runs to begin with.
As long as this is the case, making more substantial death penalties only serves to increase the amount of time your customers have to spend doing stuff that they did not want to do to begin with - not the best business plan for a genre that depends on retaining satisfied customers.
I liked this post so much I decided to leave a comment, however, you've said it all already; so, yay! Comment!
ReplyDeleteIf one dislikes one's games that much probably better not to play them.
ReplyDeleteI just lost a ship in Eve. Rather than having to repeat something dull it meant that I had to rethink my tactics, talk about the situation with my alliance mates and try to find a good solution to a player threat. We couldn't find a solution so I've ended up having to log off.
But the real currency in any game is player interest. The game became more interesting because it challenged me in this way. Even if balked this time, next time I hope we'll have the planning, the equipment and the ability to turn the tables on the guys who just ganked me.
I think the key is to find a game where death instead of being purely a setback (gahhh, I have to re-do this shitty pug dungeon that I'm sick of), death should be a fluid changing of the play into a different form (I changed from planning to make money to planning to kill some dudes).
I'm playing the new xcom on ironman, and it does 2 things that I think make ironman the way to go. First, it speeds up the game; you don't spend hours reloading and replaying every fight to get through in perfect shape. Second, it creates consequences that have to be dealt with instead of sidestepped, broadening the gameplay. Death is an added challenge instead of a time-consumer. I don't think I'll ever play it on normal, because the temptation to reload and replay would be too strong, and then you get stuck playing in this narrow valley of perfect outcomes.
ReplyDelete